Duty drawback taxed on actual receipt; unsupported estimated addition and linked penalty both fail.

Duty drawback is taxable on actual receipt under the Income-tax Act, and an addition based on presumed higher receipts could not be sustained where the assessee's books and bank statements showed only amounts actually realised and the supporting CBEC material was not furnished for rebuttal. On that basis, the quantum addition was deleted. The consequential penalty under section 270A also fell away because it was wholly founded on the deleted addition and no separate misreporting survived. The matter thus turned on receipt-based taxation of duty drawback and the evidentiary failure underlying the estimated addition.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the addition made on account of duty drawback was sustainable when the assessee had accounted the receipts on actual realization basis and the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer was not furnished to the assessee. (ii) Whether the penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained after the quantum addition on duty drawback was deleted.

Issue (i): Whether the addition made on account of duty drawback was sustainable when the assessee had accounted the receipts on actual realization basis and the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer was not furnished to the assessee.

Analysis: Duty drawback is income within section 2(24)(xviii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and section 145B(3) mandates taxation in the year of receipt. The records and bank statements showed that the assessee had credited the duty drawback only to the extent actually received during the year. The addition was made by presuming a higher amount on the basis of CBEC data, without furnishing the underlying material to the assessee for rebuttal. In the absence of supporting evidence, the estimated addition could not stand.

Conclusion: The addition on account of duty drawback was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained after the quantum addition on duty drawback was deleted.

Analysis: The penalty was founded on the very addition that had been deleted in quantum proceedings. Once it was held that the assessee had not misreported income and the duty drawback was correctly offered on receipt basis, the foundation for penalty disappeared.

Conclusion: The penalty under section 270A was set aside and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The quantum addition and the consequential penalty were both vacated, resulting in complete relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Duty drawback is taxable on actual receipt, and an addition based on unverified third-party data cannot survive when the assessee's books and bank records establish the amount actually received; a penalty depending entirely on such deleted addition cannot be sustained.

---