Section 153C satisfaction note must link seized material to total income; vague recording vitiates jurisdiction.

Section 153C satisfaction must clearly record that seized material has a bearing on determination of the assessee's total income; absent that definite nexus, jurisdiction to proceed is vitiated. The Tribunal held that the impugned common satisfaction note, recorded after search, did not expressly link the seized material with the assessee's taxable income for the relevant assessment years. Rejecting the Revenue's contention that the word "bearing" was not mandatory, it treated the deficiency as a jurisdictional defect and quashed the assessments in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the section 153C assessments were liable to be quashed for want of a valid satisfaction note stating that the seized material had a bearing on determination of the assessee's total income.

Analysis: The impugned common satisfaction recorded after the search did not ly state that the seized material had a bearing on determination of the assessee's total income for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal treated this as a jurisdictional defect, relying on the settled requirement that the satisfaction note under section 153C must connect the seized material with the assessee's taxable income in a clear and definite manner. The Revenue's objection that use of the word "bearing" was not mandatory was rejected in light of the governing legal position.

Conclusion: The section 153C assessments were quashed and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

---