Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand raised under Section 156 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the recoveries made pursuant to it could survive after approval of the resolution plan under Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: Once a resolution plan is approved by the adjudicating authority under Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the claims covered by the plan stand frozen and are binding on all stakeholders, including governmental authorities. Claims not forming part of the approved resolution plan stand extinguished, and no proceedings can be initiated or continued in respect of such claims. The demand in question was not included in the approved resolution plan, and the subsequent recoveries were therefore inconsistent with the statutory effect of approval of the resolution plan.
Conclusion: The demand notice was unsustainable and was set aside. The recoveries already made were directed to be refunded with applicable interest.