Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made by processing the return under section 143(1) on account of foreign contribution shown in the wrong schedule, despite disclosure in the books and return, was sustainable.
Analysis: The assessee had accounted for the foreign contribution in its books and had disclosed it in the return of income, but had mentioned it in the wrong schedule. The rejection of the claim rested only on the ground that a revised return had not been filed. The governing principle applied was that tax cannot be collected beyond what is legitimately due, and an inadvertent clerical or schedule-entry error, when the income is otherwise disclosed, does not justify sustaining an addition.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable and was deleted.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the sole issue, and the assessed addition relating to foreign contribution was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where income is fully disclosed in the return and books, a mere mistake in placing it in the wrong schedule cannot, by itself, justify an addition in processing or assessment.