Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was liable to pay an amount under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 in respect of non-excisable goods cleared from the factory.
Analysis: Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 prohibits credit on inputs used exclusively for exempted goods, requires separate accounts where both dutiable and exempted goods are manufactured, and mandates payment under Rule 6(3) where common credit is taken without maintaining separate records. After the amendment with effect from 01.03.2015, non-excisable goods are included within exempted goods for the purpose of Rule 6. On the facts established by the Chartered Accountant's certificate, the appellant had not availed CENVAT credit on inputs used for the non-excisable goods or on common inputs used up to the stage of emergence of such by-products.
Conclusion: The appellant had complied with Rule 6(1) and Rule 6(2), and no liability arose under Rule 6(3).
Final Conclusion: The demand, interest, and penalty could not be sustained, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no CENVAT credit is availed on inputs used for exempted or non-excisable goods, and no common credit is taken in relation to both dutiable and such goods, the payment obligation under Rule 6(3) does not arise.