Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority could dismiss the statutory appeal on limitation while the rectification application against the assessment order remained pending, and whether the rectification application had to be decided first.
Analysis: The assessment order had been passed under Section 74 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the petitioner had already moved a rectification application under Section 161 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal for delay without first deciding the pending rectification request. Since the rectification application sought correction of the very order under challenge, it was appropriate that the application be decided before the appeal was dealt with. The State also stated that the application had earlier remained undecided because it was misplaced and had now been recovered.
Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal was set aside, and the respondent-State was directed to decide the rectification application afresh after granting personal hearing and by passing a reasoned order.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained restoration of the matter for decision on rectification, with the appellate dismissal removed and the dispute sent back for a speaking determination.
Ratio Decidendi: When a rectification application against an assessment order is pending, fairness requires that it be decided before the appeal against that order is finally dealt with.