Reassessment notice based on vague third-party seized material was quashed for lacking any discernible nexus with the assessee.

Reassessment under Section 148 requires prima facie material with a discernible nexus to the assessee, even at the notice stage. Where the reopening rested on a seized inquiry register entry from third-party search proceedings that referred to other land transactions, did not name the assessee, and did not show any direct or indirect connection with the assessee's agricultural land purchase, the material was treated as vague and unspecific. The reassessment notice and the consequential reassessment order were therefore unsustainable and were quashed in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the consequential reassessment order could be sustained when they were founded on seized material that did not establish a live link with the assessee.

Analysis: The reopening was based on an extract of an inquiry register recovered in search proceedings from third parties dealing in land transactions. The material referred to non-agricultural land and to a broker, while the assessee had purchased agricultural land. The seized entry did not contain the assessee's name, did not show any direct or indirect nexus with the assessee, and the statement recorded from the searched person also did not identify the assessee. Although reassessment at the notice stage requires only prima facie material and not proof of escapement, the material must still have relevance and a discernible connection with the assessee. On the facts, the information was treated as vague, unspecific, and incapable of forming a reasonable basis to reopen the assessment.

Conclusion: The reassessment notice and the consequential reassessment order were unsustainable and were quashed, in favour of the assessee.

---