Section 68 addition on loan receipts fails where banking trail and lender identity evidence were unrebutted.

Section 68 addition for an unsecured loan was not sustainable where the assessee produced primary evidence of identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, supported by a banking trail and repayment record. General search findings and third-party allegations that the lender was a shell entity were insufficient without specific incriminating material or a direct nexus to the assessee. Once the assessee discharged the initial burden, the onus shifted to the Assessing Officer to rebut the evidence with cogent material, which was not done. The deletion of the addition was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 5,00,00,000 under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the loan received from Ganak Conglomerate Pvt. Ltd. was sustainable.

Analysis: The addition was founded mainly on general findings from search actions and third-party information describing the lender as a shell entity providing accommodation entries. No specific incriminating material relatable to the assessee was brought on record, nor was any direct nexus shown between the assessee and the alleged accommodation entry. The appellate record showed a complete banking trail, repayment of the amount, and documentary evidence supporting the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the lender. Once the assessee produced primary evidence, the burden shifted to the Assessing Officer to rebut it with cogent material, which was not done.

Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not justified and its deletion was upheld in favour of the assessee.

---