Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether unabsorbed depreciation could be set off against the addition made as unaccounted stock, and whether it could be treated as current year loss for the purpose of set-off; (ii) Whether the later provisions relating to denial of set-off in cases of search-related undisclosed income affected the assessee's claim for the assessment year in question.
Issue (i): Whether unabsorbed depreciation could be set off against the addition made as unaccounted stock, and whether it could be treated as current year loss for the purpose of set-off.
Analysis: Unabsorbed depreciation carried forward under Section 32(2) assumes the character of current year depreciation. The claim for set-off had to be examined along with the scheme of carry forward and set-off under Section 72, which permits adjustment against other income as well, subject to the statutory limits. The authorities had proceeded on the footing that the addition represented deemed income and therefore could not be adjusted against depreciation loss, but the relevant statutory provisions governing set-off were not properly considered.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to set off the unabsorbed depreciation against the income assessed in the year in question.
Issue (ii): Whether the later provisions relating to denial of set-off in cases of search-related undisclosed income affected the assessee's claim for the assessment year in question.
Analysis: The restriction introduced by Section 79A was not applicable, as it came into force only from 01.04.2022. The argument based on Section 115BBE also did not assist the revenue because the assessment was not made under that provision. The later amendment denying set-off of loss under Section 115BBE(2) was not relevant to the assessment year under appeal.
Conclusion: The later provisions did not bar the assessee's claim for set-off.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the substantial questions of law, and the addition could be reduced by giving effect to the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation.
Ratio Decidendi: Unabsorbed depreciation carried forward under the Act retains the character of current year depreciation and may be set off against eligible income under the statutory scheme, while later restrictions on set-off do not apply to earlier assessment years unless expressly made applicable.