Service tax exemption for overseas commission upheld despite minor procedural lapses when export and supporting documents were established.

Exemption under Notification No. 42/2012-Service Tax could not be denied where export of goods, realization of export proceeds, payment of commission to the overseas agent, and supporting records were established. The assessee produced chartered accountant certification, EXP-3 filing, original invoices, bank advices, declarations that the taxable services were received and used for export, and the agency agreement. On these facts, the exemption conditions were treated as substantially satisfied, and minor procedural lapses were held insufficient to defeat the substantive entitlement.

---

---

Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 42/2012-Service Tax dated 29.06.2012 could be denied for non-compliance with certain procedural requirements despite export of goods, realization of export proceeds, payment of commission to the overseas agent, and production of supporting documents.

Analysis: The appellants established export of goods and realization of export proceeds. The record also showed payment of commission to the foreign agent, certified by a chartered accountant, filing of EXP-3, production of original invoices, declarations that the taxable services were received and used for export of goods, bank advices, and the agreement with the overseas commission agent. On these facts, the conditions for exemption were held to have been substantially satisfied. The remaining lapses were treated as minor procedural infractions that did not affect eligibility or the substantive entitlement to exemption.

Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 42/2012-Service Tax dated 29.06.2012 could not be denied on the ground of minor procedural lapses, and the benefit was held admissible to the assessee.

---