Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to avail Input Tax Credit for the relevant financial year in view of the amended provisions extending the time limit, and whether the demand confirmed under the Order-in-Original could be sustained.
Analysis: The amendment to Section 16 of the CGST Act introduced sub-sections (5) and (6), which extended the period for availing Input Tax Credit for specified financial years up to 30 November 2021. In view of the amendment, the challenge to the demand based on Section 16(4) no longer survived to that extent, and the petitioner was held entitled to the benefit of Input Tax Credit for the relevant period. The respondents' request for payment of the excess utilised amount and interest was accepted by the petitioner.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to the benefit of Input Tax Credit for the relevant period, the Order-in-Original was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to pay the excess utilised amount and interest within 30 days.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by granting partial relief to the petitioner while preserving the limited monetary liability accepted by the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory amendment expressly extends the time limit for availing Input Tax Credit for specified periods, a demand founded solely on the earlier time bar cannot be sustained to that extent.