Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the retrospective cancellation of GST registration was valid when the show cause notice did not specifically propose retrospective cancellation and the assessee was not afforded seven working days to respond.
Analysis: Retrospective cancellation of GST registration is permissible, but only when the assessee is put to clear notice of that proposed action and is given the statutory opportunity to respond. Rule 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 requires a show cause notice in FORM GST REG-17 and grants at least seven working days from service of notice to file a reply. A notice that does not disclose the proposal for retrospective cancellation, or which is served without the mandated response time, does not satisfy the statutory requirement or the standard of fair procedure. On the facts, the later notice and email did not cure the defect because the petitioner was not afforded the prescribed time before the cancellation order was passed.
Conclusion: The retrospective cancellation of GST registration was unlawful and the cancellation order was set aside. The action was held to be in violation of Rule 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and the requirement of fair notice.
Ratio Decidendi: Retrospective cancellation of GST registration can be sustained only if the assessee is specifically put to notice of that proposal and is granted the statutory period of at least seven working days to .