Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment for the year under appeal, completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was liable to be treated as one required to be made under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because it fell within the relevant six preceding assessment years counted from the date of recording satisfaction.
Analysis: The appeal turned on the settled principle that, for assessment of a person other than the searched person under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the six preceding assessment years are computed from the date of handing over of seized material or the date of recording satisfaction, as applicable. On the admitted facts, the satisfaction was recorded on 04.10.2022, and the relevant six assessment years therefore extended to cover the assessment year in question. Since the year under appeal fell within that block, the assessment made under Section 143(3) could not stand.
Conclusion: The assessment for the year under appeal was liable to be made under Section 153C and the assessment under Section 143(3) was vitiated.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and the assessment order did not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: For Section 153C assessments, the six preceding assessment years are to be reckoned from the date of recording satisfaction or handing over of seized material, and an assessment year falling within that block cannot validly be completed under Section 143(3).