Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent had contravened the anti-profiteering mandate by failing to pass on the benefit of Input Tax Credit to the complainants in a project undertaken wholly in the post-GST period, and whether the preliminary objections based on the applicability of the post-GST construction and pricing structure were sustainable.
Analysis: The unit was booked, allotted, contracted for, constructed, and paid for entirely during the GST regime. On those facts, the situation fell within the principle that where construction and supply take place wholly post-GST and the price is fixed after factoring the then-applicable tax structure, no separate pre-GST comparison yields a transferable ITC benefit. The ratio of credit availed to purchase value also showed no incremental benefit to the respondent, as the comparative percentage declined from the pre-GST period to the post-GST period. Accordingly, the anti-profiteering allegation was not made out and the respondent's preliminary objections succeeded.
Conclusion: The respondent was not held to have contravened the anti-profiteering provision, and the complainants' challenge to the DGAP report failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a housing project is undertaken entirely in the post-GST period and the pricing is fixed in that regime after accounting for the applicable tax structure, no liability to pass on an alleged pre-GST Input Tax Credit benefit arises under the anti-profiteering provision.