Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of cash deposits treated as unexplained money under section 69A was liable to be restricted further from 10% to 5% of the balance cash deposits.
Analysis: The assessed cash deposits were partly accepted as explained from cash sales and partly from cash withdrawals, but strict one-to-one correlation between deposits and withdrawals was found not possible. The appellate authority had already estimated the unexplained portion at 10% of the balance deposits. Considering the nature of the explanation, the absence of complete reconciliation, and the facts of the case, a further reduction in the estimated disallowance was found justified in the interest of substantial justice.
Conclusion: The addition was reduced to 5% of the balance cash deposits, resulting in a lower confirmed addition in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of further reduction of the estimated addition, and the remaining addition stood sustained on a restricted basis.
Ratio Decidendi: Where cash deposits are partly supported by explanation but exact one-to-one linkage with withdrawals cannot be established, the unexplained portion may be estimated on a reasonable basis rather than treated in full as unexplained money.