Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had contravened the Foreign Trade Policy by simultaneously availing the benefit of Status Holders Incentive Scrips and Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme, and whether the Cenvat credit taken on capital goods imported against transferred SHIS scrips was liable to be denied.
Analysis: The disputed restriction in para 3.16.2 of the Foreign Trade Policy operates against a Status Holder who avails TUFS in a particular year and seeks SHIS for exports of that same year. On the facts, the appellant did not obtain SHIS on the basis of its own exports. It purchased SHIS scrips from other license holders, and those scrips had been issued to the original holders against their exports. The appellant used the scrips only for debiting customs duties on imported capital goods and was, therefore, a transferee license holder. The record also showed that TUFS benefit was availed in 2013-14, whereas no SHIS benefit was availed by the appellant on its own exports in that year. The exemption notification and the customs/cenvat framework permitted import of capital goods against such scrips and allowed Cenvat credit of the eligible additional duty, so the demand proceeded on an incorrect premise.
Conclusion: The restriction against simultaneous availing of SHIS and TUFS was not attracted to the appellant, and denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable. The issue is answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: The bar on SHIS where TUFS is availed in the same year applies to SHIS entitlement based on the holder's own exports, not to a transferee who purchases and uses valid SHIS scrips for import of capital goods.