TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 was warranted on the facts of the case. (ii) Whether education cess, including secondary and higher education cess, was allowable as a deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in view of Explanation 3 to section 40(a)(ii).
Issue (i): Whether the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 was warranted on the facts of the case.
Analysis: The assessee accepted that the disallowance was computed in conformity with the earlier directions and that only investments yielding exempt income were considered. The finding of the first appellate authority sustaining the disallowance therefore required no interference.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether education cess, including secondary and higher education cess, was allowable as a deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in view of Explanation 3 to section 40(a)(ii).
Analysis: Explanation 3 inserted by the Finance Act, 2022 clarifies that tax includes surcharge and cess for the purposes of section 40(a)(ii). Following the Supreme Court ruling that education cess is not allowable as an expenditure, the deduction claimed by the assessee could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The deduction of education cess, including secondary and higher education cess, was disallowed and the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeal failed, while the Revenue's appeal succeeded on the deduction of education cess.
Ratio Decidendi: Education cess and secondary and higher education cess are not deductible as business expenditure, and disallowance under section 14A is sustainable where the computation is confined to investments yielding exempt income.
TaxTMI 
