Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition sustained in reassessment could rest solely on an excel sheet found during survey at a third party premises without proper nexus or corroboration with the assessee's alleged purchase transaction.
Analysis: The reassessment was founded on a loose excel sheet found in the course of survey on a builder's premises. The sheet related to a different project and did not satisfactorily correlate with the shop purchased by the assessee in 2021. The record also showed cheque payments and a notarized affidavit from the developer denying receipt of cash from the assessee. In the absence of corroborative material, the document by itself was not sufficient to sustain the inference that the assessee had made undisclosed cash payments.
Conclusion: The addition could not be sustained and was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment addition was set aside because the material relied upon did not establish a credible link between the assessee and the alleged cash payment.
Ratio Decidendi: A third-party loose sheet or excel extract, without corroboration and without a clear nexus to the assessee, cannot by itself justify an addition in assessment.