Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether approval granted under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by merely recording the word "Approved" without reasons or satisfaction, was valid.
Analysis: Section 151 requires the competent authority to apply mind and record satisfaction, even if briefly, before authorising reassessment. A bare endorsement of "Approved" does not disclose any consideration of the matter and amounts to a ritualistic and mechanical exercise. Such an approval fails the statutory safeguard built into the provision and cannot sustain the reassessment proceedings.
Conclusion: The approval was invalid, granted in a mechanical and non-speaking manner, and was rightly quashed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment foundation failed for want of valid sanction, and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Approval under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, must reflect application of mind and recorded satisfaction, however brief; a mere endorsement of "Approved" is insufficient and renders the sanction invalid.