Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte assessment order warranted interference and remand for fresh adjudication, subject to pre-deposit and filing of reply.
Analysis: The order had been passed without a reply from the petitioner and was treated as ex parte in nature. In such circumstances, the Court directed reconsideration on merits and in accordance with law, while requiring the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice with supporting documents and to deposit 25% of the disputed tax in cash or through the electronic cash register within the stipulated time. Any amount already recovered from the petitioner was directed to be adjusted towards the pre-deposit, and if the recovered amount satisfied the pre-deposit requirement, no further deposit was required.
Conclusion: The assessment order was remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration, subject to compliance with the directed pre-deposit and reply filing.