Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made to Singapore-based entities for architectural, consultancy, and structural design services constituted fees for technical services under Article 12(4) of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement so as to trigger tax deduction under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The services were confined to drawings, designs, and consultancy for a specific real estate project. The relevant treaty provision applied only where managerial, technical, or consultancy services also made available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes enabling independent use by the recipient, or involved development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design. The services here were project-specific and were not shown to have transferred any such usable technical knowledge or skill to the assessee. The factual position was found to be identical to the assessee's earlier year, where the same issue had been decided in its favour.
Conclusion: The payments did not constitute fees for technical services under Article 12(4) of the treaty, no liability to deduct tax at source arose under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was rightly deleted.