Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coercive recovery could be continued pending consideration of the petitioner's application before the appellate authority on compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act.
Analysis: The petitioner had already filed an appeal and a stay application before the appellate authority and had also moved a separate application asserting compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. That application had not yet been decided. In these circumstances, the Court considered it appropriate that the appellate authority first decide the application expeditiously and in accordance with law, and granted interim protection against coercive recovery till such decision.
Conclusion: Coercive recovery was restrained until the appellate authority decided the pending application, and the petitioner obtained interim relief.