Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned adjudication and appellate orders were liable to be quashed and the matter remanded in view of the admitted factual position regarding reversal and reclassification of the input tax credit before the show cause notice.
Analysis: The petitioner invoked writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to challenge the orders passed under the Central Goods and Services Tax regime. The respondent's counsel confirmed the correctness of the petitioner's factual assertion that the relevant credit had been reversed and claimed under the proper head before issuance of the show cause notice. In light of that confirmation, the basis on which the authorities had proceeded required reconsideration. The Court therefore set aside the impugned orders and directed a fresh adjudication, expressly clarifying that no finding was returned on the merits of the claim.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration.