Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2026 (3) TMI 1612 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Documentary proof, valuation method and unrebutted cash trail determine whether loan, premium and deposit additions stand. Unsecured loan credits may be accepted under section 68 where the assessee substantiates identity, creditworthiness and genuineness through PAN, audited ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Documentary proof, valuation method and unrebutted cash trail determine whether loan, premium and deposit additions stand.

                            Unsecured loan credits may be accepted under section 68 where the assessee substantiates identity, creditworthiness and genuineness through PAN, audited financials, bank records and lender confirmation, and the Revenue offers no contrary evidence. Share premium valuation under section 56(2)(viib) must be tested by the applicable valuation method for the relevant year; a book value method report was accepted where the merchant banker requirement was found inapplicable. Cash deposits were also explained by cash books, bank statements and audited records showing earlier withdrawals and business-linked cash availability, leaving no basis for the addition in the absence of rebuttal evidence.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the unsecured loan received from the sister concern was sustainable; (ii) Whether the addition made under section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on account of share premium valuation was sustainable; (iii) Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of cash deposits in the bank account was sustainable.

                            Issue (i): Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the unsecured loan received from the sister concern was sustainable.

                            Analysis: The assessee supported the loan transaction with PAN details, audited financial statements, bank statements, and confirmation from the lender. The lender also responded to notice under section 133(6) and confirmed the transaction. The material on record established the identity of the lender, its creditworthiness, and the genuineness of the transaction, and the Revenue did not rebut these findings with contrary evidence.

                            Conclusion: The addition under section 68 in respect of the unsecured loan was rightly deleted and the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the addition made under section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on account of share premium valuation was sustainable.

                            Analysis: The assessee had adopted the book value method for valuation of shares and obtained a report accordingly. The requirement of a merchant banker report was held to arise in the context of the discounted free cash flow method, and the later notification relied upon by the Revenue was found inapplicable to the year in question. The valuation adopted by the assessee was therefore accepted as valid.

                            Conclusion: The addition under section 56(2)(viib) was rightly deleted and the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (iii): Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of cash deposits in the bank account was sustainable.

                            Analysis: The assessee demonstrated, through cash books, bank statements, and audited records, that the cash deposits were sourced from earlier cash withdrawals and were linked to the business needs of a construction concern. The Revenue did not bring cogent evidence to dislodge the documentary trail or the explanation of cash availability.

                            Conclusion: The addition under section 68 in respect of cash deposits was rightly deleted and the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

                            Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed on all three substantive additions, and the appellate order deleting the additions was sustained in full.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee substantiates a cash credit or loan with primary documentary evidence establishing identity, creditworthiness, genuineness, and corroborating confirmations, an addition under section 68 cannot be sustained in the absence of rebuttal evidence; similarly, share valuation must be examined with reference to the applicable valuation method and governing rule for the relevant year.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found