Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order was liable to be quashed for breach of principles of natural justice for want of hearing and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The notice issued to the petitioner expressly required appearance on a future date and also called for a representation with supporting evidence. The impugned order, however, was passed before that scheduled hearing date and without affording the petitioner an opportunity to reply or be heard. On these facts, the procedural safeguard of hearing was not observed, and the order could not be sustained. The appropriate course was to set aside the order and remit the proceedings to the authority for fresh decision after granting hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed and set aside and the proceedings were remanded for fresh adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing, in favour of the assessee.