Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made by estimating the profit of the contract business at 8% could be sustained, or whether the net profit rate of 6.10% declared by the assessee was to be accepted.
Analysis: The appeal was decided by considering the assessee's past history, the earlier decision in the assessee's own case for a prior assessment year, and the nature of the contract business. The declared net profit rate was found to be reasonable, and the lower authorities had not brought on record any material or evidence to justify variation from the declared results. In these circumstances, the estimation of profit at 8% was not sustained.
Conclusion: The declared net profit rate of 6.10% was accepted and the addition made by estimating profit at 8% was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the substantive dispute concerning estimation of business income, and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of material evidence to the contrary, a declared profit rate supported by the assessee's past history and the principle of consistency should be accepted, and arbitrary estimation of higher profit is not justified.