Just a moment...
AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.
Launch AI Search →Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>TCS on compounding fees for illegal mineral transporters rejected as section 206C(1C) demand and penalty fail</h1> Compounding fees and fines collected from illegal miners or mineral transporters were considered outside the ITAT's view that such receipts were ... TCS u/s 206C - compounding fees received from illegal miners/transporters of minerals - Scope of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957/ ‘the MMDR Act’ - As decided by HC [2025 (6) TMI 2041 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] ITAT is completely unjustified in holding that compounding fee/fine (TCS) would be chargeable u/s 206C(1C) of the IT Act by relying upon the definition contained in Section 2(47) of the IT Act. Accordingly, we are unable to uphold the judgment & order passed by the ITAT relying on Section 2(47) of the IT Act. Impugned judgment & order passed by the ITAT making demand and levying interest & penalty for non-compliance of Section 206C(1C) of the IT Act cannot be sustained HELD THAT:- We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) of the High Court; hence, the special leave petitions are dismissed. Outcome: Special Leave Petitions dismissed.