Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment notice issued under section 148 beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was invalid for want of approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax under section 151(ii), and whether the consequential reassessment proceedings were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The notice under section 148 was issued on 13.04.2022 for Assessment Year 2018-19, which was beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. In that situation, the prescribed sanctioning authority under section 151(ii) was the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax or the equivalent higher authority. Approval having been obtained only from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, the sanction did not satisfy the statutory requirement. The reassessment could not be sustained on the basis of approval granted for the earlier stage under section 148A(b), because a separate and valid sanction was required for issuance of notice under section 148 and for the order under section 148A(d). The defect went to jurisdiction and vitiated the entire reassessment process.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 was invalid and the reassessment proceedings were liable to be quashed, in favour of the assessee.