Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Allowability of expenditure of Rs. 47.64 crores incurred on settlement of a corporate guarantee invoked against the assessee, as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee had entered into a corporate guarantee in connection with its group business interests and the liability crystallised through arbitration and subsequent settlement. The expenditure arose from a business-linked arrangement made to protect commercial interests and settle litigation, and the liability could not be denied merely because the Revenue questioned the guarantee at a later stage. The Tribunal treated the payment as flowing from the assessee's business decision and applied the principle that commercial expediency is to be judged from the businessman's point of view, not from the Revenue's substitution of its own view.
Conclusion: The expenditure was allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1), and the disallowance of Rs. 47.64 crores was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An expenditure incurred to discharge a liability arising from a business-related corporate guarantee, where the payment is made pursuant to settlement of litigation and is commercially expedient, is allowable as revenue expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.