Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that it was substantially financed by the Government.
Analysis: The exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) depends on the institution being substantially financed by the Government. Rule 2BBB of the Income-tax Rules prescribes a quantitative test, under which Government grant must exceed 50% of the total receipts of the institution during the relevant previous year. On the facts, the assessee's Government grant was Rs. 60,00,000/- against total receipts of Rs. 1,71,65,150/-, which did not cross the prescribed threshold. The argument based on government ownership or administrative control could not override the express statutory benchmark, because the rule makes the receipt threshold a mandatory condition for the exemption.
Conclusion: The assessee failed to satisfy the statutory requirement of substantial financing and was not entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.