Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that it was substantially financed by the Government.
Analysis: The exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) depends on the institution being substantially financed by the Government. Rule 2BBB of the Income-tax Rules prescribes a quantitative test, under which Government grant must exceed 50% of the total receipts of the institution during the relevant previous year. On the facts, the assessee's Government grant was Rs. 60,00,000/- against total receipts of Rs. 1,71,65,150/-, which did not cross the prescribed threshold. The argument based on government ownership or administrative control could not override the express statutory benchmark, because the rule makes the receipt threshold a mandatory condition for the exemption.
Conclusion: The assessee failed to satisfy the statutory requirement of substantial financing and was not entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.