Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment orders warranted remand for fresh consideration on the ground of violation of natural justice, and whether such remand should be subject to payment of 25% of the disputed tax.
Analysis: The assessment arose from mismatch turnover proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax regime and the petitioner had challenged the impugned orders after notices were issued on the basis of the departmental circular governing mismatch cases. The Court noted that there were circumstances indicating that the impugned orders were passed without a proper reply and that an element of violation of principles of natural justice was present. At the same time, the Court took note of the fact that the petitioner had not pursued the statutory appeal remedy and that the matter had already undergone earlier rounds of assessment and remand. In these circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to send the matter back for fresh consideration while imposing a partial pre-deposit condition.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh assessment on merits, subject to payment of 25% of the disputed tax within 45 days and filing of a proper reply treating the impugned orders as an addendum.