Recipient-based service tax liability on goods transport freight failed where notice did not align with the amended return mechanism.

Recipient-based service tax liability on goods transport operator freight for the period 16-11-1997 to 1-6-1998 had to be pursued under the special return mechanism in Section 71A of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 7A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. Proceedings based on an earlier show cause notice issued under Section 73 in the pre-amendment regime could not be sustained without a revised notice aligned to the amended framework and the extended return period. On that basis, the demand was held untenable and set aside in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the service tax demand on freight paid to goods transport operators for the period 16-11-1997 to 1-6-1998, raised by show cause notice dated 22-03-2002 under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, was sustainable in law.

Analysis: The demand concerned the recipient of goods transport operator services for a period covered by the validating amendments introduced after the initial levy controversy. The Tribunal followed the line of authority holding that, for such recipient-based liability, the statutory framework required compliance with the special return mechanism under Section 71A of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 7A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, and that proceedings could not be sustained on the basis of an earlier notice issued in the context of the pre-amendment regime under Section 73. The absence of a revised notice aligning the proceedings with the amended provisions and the extended time allowed for filing the return rendered the demand untenable. The Tribunal also distinguished the authorities relied on by the Revenue as factually inapplicable to the present notice and time frame.

Conclusion: The demand was not sustainable and was liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee.

---