Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner could refuse to exercise the power under Section 17(7) of the Odisha Entry Tax Act, 1999 to stay realization during pendency of the appeal on the ground that any consideration of the request would touch the merits of the appeal, and whether the impugned order was liable to be set aside for absence of reasons.
Analysis: Section 17(7) confers power on the Commissioner to stay realization of tax, interest or penalty, in whole or in part, while the appeal remains pending before the Tribunal. The power is meant to operate during the appellate stage and any observation made for deciding the stay application is only tentative and does not bind or prejudice the Tribunal in the merits of the appeal. Refusing to exercise the power merely because the appeal is pending, or because some reference to the issues may be made, defeats the statutory purpose. The impugned order, though lengthy, did not record the requisite reasons for declining relief and therefore did not satisfy the statutory requirement.
Conclusion: The refusal to consider the stay application on the stated ground was unsustainable, and the order was rightly set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute confers power to grant stay of realization during pendency of an appeal, the authority must decide the application on reasons germane to stay and cannot decline to exercise the power merely because the appeal is pending or because the order may incidentally refer to the merits.