Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year in respect of new plant and machinery acquired in the previous year and put to use for less than 180 days, notwithstanding the proviso to Section 32(1) restricting deduction to 50% in the previous year.
Analysis: The Court examined Section 32(1) and clause (iia) which grant additional depreciation for new plant and machinery and the proviso which restricts the deduction to fifty per cent where the asset is put to use for less than 180 days in the previous year. The Court relied on prior Division Bench decisions of this Court and the explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act, 2015, which indicate the legislative intent to avoid discrimination and to incentivise investment in new plant and machinery. Applying that statutory framework and precedent, the Court held that the proviso limits the quantum allowable in the first year but does not extinguish the remaining entitlement; the balance fifty per cent can be carried forward and allowed in the subsequent assessment year to ensure parity and effectuate the incentive.
Conclusion: The assessee is entitled to claim the balance 50% of the additional depreciation in the subsequent assessment year; the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.