Section 68 share capital additions fail when identity, allotment records and bank evidence support the transaction trail.

Share capital additions under section 68 are not sustainable where the assessee furnishes allotment records, shareholder confirmations, bank statements, identity proof and other supporting documents establishing the subscribers and the transaction trail. If the Revenue's objection is limited to non-appearance of some shareholders or doubt about deposits in accounts of persons one step removed from the assessee, the proper course is to proceed against the concerned shareholders in accordance with law. On these facts, the Tribunal found no infirmity in deletion of the major part of the addition, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of share capital received from multiple shareholders was sustainable when the assessee furnished allotment details, confirmations, bank statements and other supporting documents.

Analysis: The assessee had produced evidence regarding the allotment of shares, the identity of the subscribers, their statements where available, and documentary support including returns, bank statements, identity proofs and source details. The record showed that the Revenue's objection rested mainly on non-appearance of some shareholders and on concerns relating to deposits in the bank accounts of persons who were one step removed from the assessee. The addition was also tested against the settled principle that once the names of shareholders and supporting material are furnished, the Department may proceed against the shareholders in accordance with law if any doubt remains. On the facts, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the appellate order deleting the major part of the addition.

Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not sustainable to the extent deleted by the appellate authority, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where share applicants are identified and the assessee furnishes credible documentary evidence of the transaction and the subscribers' capacity, an addition under section 68 cannot be sustained merely because the Revenue suspects inadequacy in the subscribers' or source's explanation; the proper course is to proceed against the concerned shareholders in accordance with law.

---