Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated by reopening assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on notice under Section 148 and approval under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are valid where the approving authority recorded only a mechanical approval.
Analysis: Reopening of assessment requires valid sanction under the statutory scheme governing approval for issuance of notice under Section 148. The approval recorded in the present case consisted of a brief statement of satisfaction without application of mind and is of the same character as approvals held to be mechanical by several high courts. Where non-jurisdictional high courts have given conflicting views on the required degree of reasoning in such approvals, the controlling principle is that the construction favourable to the assessee must be adopted. Applying that principle to the facts, the approval is found to be a mechanical sanction that vitiates the assumption of jurisdiction by the assessing authority, rendering the reassessment proceedings unsustainable.
Conclusion: The approval under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is mechanical and the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 read with Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are quashed; appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.