Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment order dated 27.01.2025 and consequential order dated 04.07.2025 can be set aside and the matter remanded where notices were uploaded on the IT portal, no personal hearing was given, and the petitioner claims lack of effective service.
Analysis: The Court examined whether service by uploading notices on the IT portal, without any effective follow-up, resulted in denial of opportunity of personal hearing and thereby breached the principles of natural justice. The Court considered the need for the Officer to explore alternative modes of service prescribed under Section 282 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 when there is no response to portal notices, including sending notices by RPAD, to ensure effective service and avoid mere formal compliance. The Court also took into account the petitioner's willingness to make an interim payment and sought to frame an appropriate remedial order to enable the petitioner to file replies and obtain a hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order dated 27.01.2025 and the consequential order dated 04.07.2025 are set aside and the matter is remanded to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration subject to the condition that the petitioner pays Rs. 5,00,000 within four weeks, after which the portal shall be opened for filing reply, and the respondent shall issue a 14 days RPAD notice fixing personal hearing and thereafter pass orders on merits.