Section 32A IBC protection applies only after resolution plan approval and clean change in management; suspension of sentence rejected.

Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 applies only after approval of a resolution plan and only where management or control passes to a person unconnected with the prior management, so its clean-slate protection does not shield wrongdoers. The moratorium under Section 14 is separate and does not extinguish liability. As no resolution plan had been approved, the required conditions for Section 32A were absent, and the proceedings had also been instituted before insolvency. On that basis, the appellant was not entitled to suspension of sentence and the request was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to suspension of sentence on the basis of insolvency and liquidation proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis: Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 operates only when the resolution plan has been approved and the statutory conditions for a change in management or control in favour of a person unconnected with the prior management are satisfied. The provision is intended to give a clean slate to a new management and not to absolve the wrongdoers. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is distinct and does not extinguish liability. As no resolution plan had been approved and the requisite conditions were not met, the appellant could not derive protection under Section 32A. The proceedings were also instituted prior to insolvency.

Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to suspension of sentence and the request was rejected.

---