Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 45,36,000 under Section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on account of alleged bogus purchases should be sustained in full or requires modification.
Analysis: Undisputed evidence shows purchases of Rs. 45,36,000 from a supplier alleged to be an accommodation entry provider; the assessee produced invoices, e-way bills, transport receipts and bank payment records which were not accepted by the Assessing Officer. The corresponding sales were not doubted and the books of account were not rejected under Section 145(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Where books are accepted and sales are not disbelieved, a complete disallowance of recorded purchases as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C is not automatically warranted. In such circumstances, an assessment of the additional income embedded in suspect purchases by application of a reasonable estimated percentage is an appropriate method when specific gross profit or net profit rates for the trade are not furnished.
Conclusion: The order under appeal is set aside in part and the matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer with a direction to estimate income at the rate of 3% on the disputed purchases of Rs. 45,36,000 under Section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in addition to the profits already declared in the books.