Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether documents specifically referred to in a complaint but not filed with it can later be brought on record under section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; and whether such filing amounts to an impermissible amendment of the complaint causing prejudice to the accused.
Analysis: There is no general provision in criminal procedure equivalent to amendment of pleadings under the civil law, but criminal courts may permit correction of curable infirmities where no serious prejudice is caused. The power under section 311 is wide and is not confined to oral testimony alone; it extends to documentary material as well, if the material is essential for a just decision. The documents in question were already referred to in the complaint and annexures, and the later application was only to place those existing materials on record, not to introduce a new case or change the nature of the complaint. Since the documents were part of the factual foundation already disclosed and their production was found necessary for a fair adjudication, the order allowing their filing did not amount to an impermissible amendment.
Conclusion: The application under section 311 was rightly allowed and the challenge to that order fails.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order permitting the documents to be taken on record was sustained, and the petitions were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 permits the court to receive documentary evidence at any stage if it is essential for a just decision, and a complainant's later filing of documents already referred to in the complaint is not, by itself, an impermissible amendment where no serious prejudice is caused.