Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether services provided to foreign educational institutions constitute intermediary services; (ii) Whether proceedings stood concluded under the second proviso to Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on payment of service tax, interest and 15% penalty prior to issuance of the show cause notice.
Issue (i): Whether services rendered to foreign educational institutions are intermediary services.
Analysis: Coordinate decisions of the Tribunal and the Delhi High Court have held that services of the nature rendered to foreign universities, with consideration received in foreign exchange, do not constitute intermediary services but amount to export of services. The cited authorities and amendments to place of supply provisions support treating such services as exports rather than intermediary transactions.
Conclusion: The impugned demand and penalty on the ground that the services were intermediary services are set aside in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether payment of service tax, interest and 15% penalty before issuance of show cause notice brings the case within the second proviso to Section 78 leading to deemed conclusion of proceedings.
Analysis: Section 78 provides that payment of service tax, interest and fifteen per cent penalty within thirty days of the date of service of the notice under the proviso to section 73 results in proceedings being deemed concluded. The appellant deposited service tax, interest and 15% penalty during investigations and the amount was appropriated by the adjudicating authority. Board Circular No. 137/46/2015-ST dated 18.08.2015 and judicial precedents addressing the requirement for calculation and communication of interest and penalty are relevant to determine entitlement to the statutory benefit.
Conclusion: Payment of service tax, interest and 15% penalty during investigations meets the condition in the second proviso to Section 78; proceedings are deemed concluded to the extent of such payment and the demand in excess thereof is set aside in favour of the assessee. The Department may verify payment of interest.
Final Conclusion: The appeal is allowed in part: demands and penalties struck down to the extent covered by payments made by the assessee and the remainder of the impugned order is upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where services rendered to foreign educational institutions are exports (consideration in foreign exchange) and not intermediary services, and where service tax, interest and fifteen per cent penalty are paid within the temporal conditions of the proviso to Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, proceedings stand deemed concluded and any demand beyond the amounts so paid must be set aside.