Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of foreign bank deposits in the hands of a non-resident assessee was sustainable under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee was a non-resident during the relevant year and the deposits were in a foreign bank account opened abroad. The Court accepted the concurrent factual findings that the Revenue had not established that the deposits had a source in India or that the amounts were received, accrued, or arose in India so as to fall within the charging ambit applicable to a non-resident. It was also noted that the Revenue had not discharged the burden of proving taxability on the facts found by the appellate authorities, and the materials relied upon did not conclusively connect the foreign deposits with taxable income in India.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the case of a non-resident, foreign income or foreign deposits cannot be brought to tax in India unless the Revenue establishes that they were received, accrued, or arose in India or are otherwise taxable within the statutory limits applicable to non-residents; the burden to prove such taxability lies on the Revenue.