Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to supply of the complete relied upon documents in terms of Rule 13(2) of the Adjudicating Authority (Procedure) Regulations, 2013 before the matter proceeded further, and whether the Adjudicating Authority should first decide if the requested documents formed part of the relied upon documents.
Analysis: Rule 13(2) requires service of the summon or notice along with complete relied upon documents in a bound paper book, while Rule 13(3)(iii) and Rule 13(11) recognise service by e-mail as valid service. The petitioner had already filed para-wise comments and sought further documents, and the controversy was whether the materials already supplied were the complete relied upon documents. The proper course was for the Adjudicating Authority to examine that question first, since it was the statutory authority competent to determine whether any additional relied upon documents remained to be supplied. If further relied upon documents were found to exist, they were to be furnished and a supplementary reply was to be permitted. Any grievance against the supply order could be pursued under Section 26 of the PMLA, 2002.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to a consideration of the request for further relied upon documents and, if warranted, supply of those documents before the adjudication proceeded further, with liberty to file a supplementary reply thereafter.