Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of INR 6.25 Lakhs made as assessee's share of alleged cash payment and treated as undisclosed investment based on entries in a loose seized document (Annexure A-2) without corroborative evidence or opportunity for cross-examination is sustainable.
Analysis: The addition rests solely on entries in a loose paper seized from third parties which do not expressly state that the payment was made in cash nor is there any recorded statement or corroborative evidence attributing the cash payment to the assessee. Co-ordinate bench decisions on identical facts deleted similar additions where the seized document was a 'dumb document' and no opportunity of cross-examination of the person from whose possession the document was seized was afforded; those decisions relied on the principle that reliance on uncorroborated third-party entries without cross-examination violates the principles of natural justice and cannot sustain an addition. The seized entries here are identical in nature and the assessment was completed without recording corroborative statements or providing cross-examination of the third party; therefore the factual and procedural deficiencies identified by the co-ordinate bench apply.
Conclusion: The addition of INR 6.25 Lakhs is deleted and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An addition based solely on entries in a third-party loose seized document that does not specifically record a cash payment, and where no corroborative evidence or opportunity to cross-examine the third party was provided, is unsustainable and must be deleted.