Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte orders of assessment/adjudication under Section 73 of the KGST/CGST Acts for the financial year 2019-2020 rejecting or quantifying input tax credit (ITC) on grounds of belated claim and discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A should be set aside and the matters remitted for the petitioner to file reply, subject to protective terms to prevent revenue loss.
Analysis: The impugned orders were passed ex parte and involve disputed ITC arising from alleged mismatch between ITC shown in GSTR-3B and supplier-uploaded GSTR-2A and from a claim characterised as belated under Section 16(4) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner offered to undertake reconciliation by producing supporting material and to make an interim payment to safeguard revenue. Given the reconciliation issue and the petitioner's undertaking to cooperate and to deposit a portion of the disputed demand, it is appropriate to permit a fresh opportunity to reply to the show-cause notices and to decide the ITC claim on merits while ensuring no immediate revenue loss.
Conclusion: The ex parte Orders are set aside and the matters remitted to enable the petitioner to file replies and substantiate reconciliation of ITC; the petitioner is placed on terms to appear on the specified date and to satisfy 10% of the disputed demand within three weeks prior to proceeding further, with all contentions kept open.