Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 requires an AO order to be shown erroneous and prejudicial before interference is permitted.

The note addresses whether a Principal Commissioner properly invoked revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 to overturn an Assessing Officer's acceptance of depreciation on opening written down value of goodwill and acceptance of actual warranty expenses where the assessee had disallowed the warranty provision. The legal principle applied is that revision under section 263 requires an AO's order to be shown erroneous and prejudicial to revenue; where claims are supported by audited books and prior acceptance in earlier years or where the assessee has itself adjusted provisions, revision is improper. The tribunal quashed the revision, restored the AO's assessment, and allowed the appeal.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax rightly exercised revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to interfere with the Assessing Officer's acceptance of depreciation claimed on opening written down value of goodwill for A.Y. 2018-19; (ii) Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax rightly exercised revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to interfere with the Assessing Officer's allowance of actual warranty expenses where the assessee had itself disallowed the warranty provision.

Issue (i): Whether revision under section 263 could be sustained in respect of depreciation claimed on opening written down value of goodwill.

Analysis: Goodwill was created and depreciation on the goodwill was earlier accepted by revenue in the relevant earlier year; the assessee claimed depreciation on the opening written down value in the year under consideration supported by audited accounts and tax audit report; no impairment or inconsistency in books of account was shown for the year under consideration; if revenue had concerns about creation of goodwill, the appropriate course was reopening the assessment for the year in which goodwill was created rather than invoking section 263 for the later year; reliance on a factual distinction with the cited precedent where goodwill was impaired to nil was noted.

Conclusion: Revision under section 263 is not sustainable in respect of the depreciation claimed on goodwill; the Assessing Officer's order on this issue is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. (In favour of assessee)

Issue (ii): Whether revision under section 263 could be sustained in respect of warranty expenses where the assessee had itself added back the provision and claimed only actual expenses.

Analysis: The assessee had suo motu disallowed the warranty provision in the computation and claimed only the actual warranty expenses incurred during the year; the Assessing Officer accepted the computation; there was no material to show that the acceptance of actual warranty expense was erroneous or prejudicial to revenue; no further inquiry was shown to be necessary for the year under consideration.

Conclusion: Revision under section 263 is not sustainable in respect of warranty expenses; the Assessing Officer's order on this issue is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. (In favour of assessee)

Final Conclusion: The revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is quashed and the assessment order dated 30.06.2022 is restored, resulting in allowance of the assessee's appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 263 cannot be invoked to revise an assessment unless the Assessing Officer's order is shown to be erroneous in a manner that is prejudicial to the interests of revenue; where the Assessing Officer has accepted claims supported by books of account and prior acceptance in earlier years or where the assessee has itself adjusted provisions in the computation, the Commissioner's revisionary power is not properly exercisable.

---