Incriminating material requirement: absent search borne incriminating evidence, additions or statutory disallowances on completed assessments cannot be sustained.

Assessments opened after a search cannot sustain additions or statutory disallowances for completed or unabated assessments unless incriminating material from the search directly supports those adjustments; absent such material, reassessment or additions on mere non incriminating material are impermissible. Applying this principle, the tribunal upheld deletion of a specific addition where the assessee produced primary documentary and banking evidence and no incriminating material contradicted it, and likewise deleted disallowances under withholding, expenditure immunity and depreciation claims where the appellate fact finding recorded no search borne incriminating material. The outcome favours the assessee on both issues.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the addition of Rs. 23,47,354 made by the Assessing Officer treating certain payments as non genuine expenses can be sustained; (ii) Whether statutory disallowances (including under sections 40(a)(ia), 14A, 36(1)(iii) and disallowance of depreciation on BOT projects) made in assessment u/s. 153A r.w.s. 143(3) can be sustained in absence of incriminating material found during search.

Issue (i): Deletion of addition of Rs. 23,47,354 on account of alleged non genuine expenses.

Analysis: Section 37(1) permits deduction of business revenue expenditures if they are revenue in nature, not personal or capital, and incurred wholly and exclusively for business. The assessee produced primary documentary evidence (party name and address, PAN, RA bills, purchase register, ledger entries, bank statements) and payments were made through banking channels with TDS deducted. The Assessing Officer did not produce any incriminating material from the search to contradict the evidentiary record. A coordinate bench in the assessee's earlier year upheld deletion on similar facts; factual parity exists between years.

Conclusion: The deletion of the addition is upheld; issue decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Deletion of statutory disallowances (40(a)(ia), 14A, 36(1)(iii), depreciation on BOT projects) made in assessment u/s. 153A r.w.s. 143(3).

Analysis: The law as interpreted by the Supreme Court requires that, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, the AO may assess or reassess completed assessments on the basis of incriminating material unearthed during search; in absence of such incriminating material, additions or disallowances in respect of completed/unabated assessments cannot be made merely on other material. The appellate authority recorded a categorical finding that no incriminating material supported the disallowances and the Revenue did not point to any such material before the Tribunal. The Supreme Court's ratio in Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd. supports deletion where no incriminating material is found.

Conclusion: The deletions of the statutory disallowances are upheld; issues decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appellate tribunal upholds the findings of the first appellate authority on the decided issues and dismisses the Revenue's appeal, confirming deletion of the challenged additions and disallowances.

Ratio Decidendi: In assessments consequent to search under sections 132/132A read with section 153A, the Assessing Officer cannot make additions or disallowances in respect of completed or unabated assessments on the basis of non incriminating material; additions or reassessments in such cases are permissible only if incriminating material is unearthed during the search, otherwise the remedy is reopening under the statutory provisions governing reassessment.

---