Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the service tax, interest and penalties demanded under sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The appellants produced material to show registration with the commercial tax authorities as a works contract assessee, and the disputed activity was shown to arise out of a sub-contract connected with construction of a water reservoir. The Tribunal noted that works contract activity was brought into the service tax net only from 1 June 2007, that the activity related to construction of a water reservoir stood excluded from the taxable entry relied upon by the department, and that the same chain of work had earlier been held not taxable in respect of the principal contractor. On these facts, the Tribunal found a strong prima facie case both on merits and on limitation.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.