Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a discharge acknowledged under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 (VCES) bars a subsequent demand or proceedings for the same issue and period.
Analysis: Section 106(1) and the second proviso thereto restrict declarations where a notice or order has been issued earlier on the same issue; Section 107(7) contemplates issuance of an acknowledgement of discharge on full payment of declared tax dues; and Section 108(1) provides immunity from penalty, interest and further proceedings upon payment and issuance of the discharge acknowledgement. Where a VCES declaration has been accepted and a discharge certificate issued without any allegation of substantial falsity, subsequent proceedings seeking to assess or recover a liability that overlaps with the declared and discharged dues fall within the bar created by Section 108(1). The concept of "same subject matter" or "same issue" encompasses proceedings that seek to assess or recover an identical liability or that have even a slightest overlap in tax liability or obligation. The legality of classifying the activity as site formation service or as GTA service is not required to be examined once the declared liability for the relevant issue and period has been discharged under VCES and accepted without dispute.
Conclusion: The discharge under VCES bars the subsequent demand and proceedings in respect of the same issue and period; the impugned demand is unsustainable and is set aside in favour of the assessee.