Allotment letter as agreement requires AO verification of part payments and stamp duty comparison under 43CA before additions.

Allotment letters accompanied by part consideration received through prescribed banking channels can constitute an agreement for valuation substitution under section 43CA(3)/(4), and factual verification of part payments and comparison with stamp duty valuation as on the allotment date must be carried out by the Assessing Officer; disallowances under section 14A read with Rule 8D are not sustainable where no exempt income was earned, and corresponding add backs to book profit under section 115JB must be deleted; claims of deferred tax require verification of figures and documents by the Assessing Officer before adjudication.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether allotment letters (with part payments) qualify as an "agreement" under section 43CA(3)/(4) for substituting stamp duty value as on agreement date and whether additions under section 43CA should be recomputed or remitted for verification; (ii) Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D and its impact on book profit under section 115JB is sustainable where no exempt income was earned; (iii) Whether claim of deferred tax requires adjudication or verification by the Assessing Officer.

Issue (i): Whether allotment letters together with part consideration received through banking channels constitute an agreement for the purposes of section 43CA(3)/(4) and whether the matter requires remand for verification of stamp duty values and part payments.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined the record, the allotment letters, bank statements and ready reckoner rates, and considered precedent holdings that allotment letters may be treated as agreements where part consideration was received by prescribed banking modes on or before the allotment date. The Tribunal found that lower authorities had rejected allotment letters as not final and therefore applied a narrow interpretation. Given the additional evidence filed (bank statements and SDV ready reckoner rates) and relevant precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the factual questions of receipt of part payment and comparison of sale consideration with stamp duty values as on allotment date require verification by the Assessing Officer.

Conclusion: The issue under section 43CA is remitted to the file of the Assessing Officer for limited adjudication: (1) verification of receipt of part consideration through banking channels on or before the allotment date; and (2) comparison of actual sale consideration with stamp duty valuation prevailing on the allotment date. This issue is allowed for statistical purposes as set aside to the AO.

Issue (ii): Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D and the corresponding addition in computation of book profit under section 115JB can be sustained where the assessee did not earn any exempt income in the relevant year.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the assessee expressly stated that no exempt income was earned for the relevant year and that this factual position was not controverted by the Revenue. The Tribunal applied binding precedent of the jurisdictional High Court and the Special Bench authority on computation of book profit under section 115JB, which hold that in absence of exempt income no disallowance under section 14A is warranted and that certain 14A adjustments are not to be added back in book profit under section 115JB.

Conclusion: Disallowances under section 14A read with Rule 8D are deleted and the corresponding additions to book profit under section 115JB are disallowed. Grounds on section 14A and related 115JB issues are allowed in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether the claim relating to deferred tax requires adjudication by the Assessing Officer.

Analysis: The parties agreed that the deferred tax point involves verification of claimed figures and supporting documents. The Tribunal considered this a matter suitable for verification and factual adjudication at the assessment level.

Conclusion: The deferred tax issue is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for verification and decision in accordance with law.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal partly allows the appeals: issues under section 43CA are remitted to the Assessing Officer for limited verification; disallowances under section 14A (and related additions under section 115JB) are deleted in favour of the assessee; the deferred tax claim is remitted for verification. The appeals are therefore partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Ratio Decidendi: An allotment letter accompanied by receipt of part consideration through prescribed banking channels on or before the allotment date can be treated as an "agreement" for the purposes of section 43CA(3)/(4), and factual verification of part payments and stamp duty values as on the allotment date is necessary before making additions; in absence of any exempt income, no disallowance under section 14A (or corresponding add-back under section 115JB) is permissible.

---